And what about 0.0.0.0/8? -- Eduardo Schoedler
2015-06-17 18:21 GMT-03:00 Luan Nguyen <luan.ngu...@dimensiondata.com>: > Cisco IOS-XE Fails > ip add 241.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 > Not a valid host address - 241.1.1.1 > ip route 241.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 10.10.10.1 > %Invalid destination prefix > XR-OS : fails > Can take the IP on a interface, but cant route it > IOS fails > > we used up all the reserved ip blocks including the 169.254 and the > benchmark, and the 100.64/10 and ofcourse the RFC1918. > Lots of apps don't do ipv6 so we are finding interim solution...i guess > that's karma since doing so sort of anti-facilitating the use of ipv6 :) > > On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 5:12 PM, Ca By <cb.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 2:07 PM, Luan Nguyen <lngu...@opsource.net> > wrote: > > > > > Is that safe to use internally? Anyone using it? > > > Just for NATTING on Cisco gears... > > > > > > > most things, including most cisco gear, will not forward those Class E > > packets or accept Class E as a valid address > > > > If you have success, please report it to the list. > > > -- Eduardo Schoedler
