On 29/Apr/15 09:03, sth...@nethelp.no wrote:
> I assume you mean RFC 3630 "Traffic Engineering (TE) Extensions to > OSPF Version 2"? This would be used by providers running MPLS, RSVP-TE > and using OSPF as the IGP. > > As far as I can see it is supported by all major vendors. The reason > you don't hear all that much about it is probably that a significant > number of providers running MPLS and RSVP-TE use IS-IS as their IGP > (we do). Assuming the OP is referring to RFC 3630, I suppose you wouldn't hear much about IS-IS either in this regard, since the TE extensions to IS-IS and OSPF are not the final product. The final product would be MPLS-TE itself. IS-IS and OSPF are just a ubiquitous way to get the TE information across the backbone. Mark.
