I¹m not sure who gets to definitively answer the question (I would guess that case law will develop around it but IANAL), but this sort of caveat has been in the Open Internet rules for awhile. In general it means ISPs can¹t block stuff like Facebook but have latitude to do stuff like block a site/IP address that may be the source of an attack, etc.
- Jason On 2/27/15, 2:24 PM, "Bruce H McIntosh" <b...@ufl.edu> wrote: > >On 2015-02-27 14:14, Jim Richardson wrote: >> What's a "lawful" web site? >> >Now *there* is a $64,000 question. Even more interesting is, "Who gets >to decide day to day the answer to that question?" :)
