Either way, you can do "SDN" and automation with most Juniper kit. On purchase of JCare you get free access to Junos Space - great for provisioning and management of an IXP.
Regards, Tim Raphael > On 14 Jan 2015, at 6:28 am, Eduardo Schoedler <lis...@esds.com.br> wrote: > > My mistake, it's the OCX1100. > http://www.networkworld.com/article/2855056/sdn/juniper-unbundles-switch-hardware-software.html > > 2015-01-13 20:10 GMT-02:00 Jeff Tantsura <jeff.tants...@ericsson.com>: > >> What does it mean - to be SDN ready? >> >> Cheers, >> Jeff >> >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Eduardo Schoedler <lis...@esds.com.br> >> Date: Tuesday, January 13, 2015 at 3:25 AM >> To: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org> >> Subject: Re: Recommended L2 switches for a new IXP >> >>> QFX5100 is SDN ready. >>> >>> -- >>> Eduardo Schoedler >>> >>> >>> 2015-01-13 6:29 GMT-02:00 Stepan Kucherenko <t...@megagroup.ru>: >>> >>>> Is there any particular reason you prefer EX4600 over QFX5100 ? Not >>>> counting obvious differences like ports and upgrade options. >>>> >>>> It's the same chipset after all, and with all upgrades they have the >>>> same 10G density (with breakouts). Is that because you can have more 40G >>>> ports with EX4600 ? >>>> >>>> I'm still trying to find out if there are any noticeable software or >>>> feature differences. >>>> >>>>> On 13.01.2015 09:01, Mark Tinka wrote: >>>>>> On Monday, January 12, 2015 11:41:20 PM Tony Wicks wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> People seem to be avoiding recommending actual devices, >>>>>> well I would recommend the Juniper EX4600 - >>>>>> >>>>>> http://www.juniper.net/us/en/products-services/switching/ >>>>>> ex-series/ex4600/ >>>>>> >>>>>> They are affordable, highly scalable, stackable and run >>>>>> JunOS. >>>>> >>>>> We've been quite happy with the EX4550, but the EX4600 is >>>>> good too, particularly if you're coming from its younger >>>>> brother. >>>>> >>>>> Mark. >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Eduardo Schoedler > > > -- > Eduardo Schoedler
