On Dec 7, 2014, at 9:40 PM, Randy Bush <ra...@psg.com> wrote: > >> And there in lies my interest in all of this- there is little value in >> signing my org's routes if no one is going to validate them. It's a bit of >> an odd position in that I have a very high interest in what the rest of the >> community thinks of and how they act with respect to the RPA. In other >> words, your relationship with ARIN is now of concern to me. >> >> Maybe I'm being naively optimistic in thinking that these are solvable >> problems. > > there is the rest of the world, it is a global internet. the north > american influence decreases continuously, some because of growth of the > global internet, which is a good thing. some because of noam making > itself less and less relevant, as you point out. > > take a look at > > http://archive.psg.com://rpki-rollout.jpg > > kinda tells you what's happening, eh? lacnic has more roll-out than > arin, and proportionally it is even more impressive; over 20% of lacnic > allocations have roas. and there is ripe, with the sheer numbers.
One could easily presume the ARIN region RPKI deployment statistics are lower as a result of the RPA situation (and no doubt that it part of the issue), but as noted earlier, it's unlikely to be the full story since we also have a region (APNIC) where RPKI deployment also rather low that and yet does not have these RPA legal entanglements. It was suggested earlier that this may be due to a combination of factors (education, promotion) beyond the RPA legal issues that are now being worked - so that will also need to be addressed once the RPA is resolved. /John John Curran President and CEO ARIN
