On Dec 4, 2014, at 12:39 PM, John Curran <jcur...@arin.net> wrote: > On Dec 4, 2014, at 11:35 AM, Christopher Morrow <morrowc.li...@gmail.com> > wrote: >
> Note that the claims that could ensue from an operator failing to follow best > practices > and then third-parties suffering an major operational outage is likely to be > large > > Undertaking that risk to the other services that everyone else presently rely > upon > (Whois, reverse DNS) is not reasonable Which begs the question for me -- ARIN already operates services that operators rely upon. Why are they different? Does ARIN run no risk of litigation due to some perceived involvement of those services in someone's operational outage? Has there been litigation against ARIN tied to, for example, reverse DNS? Or the IRR? --Sandy
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
