No. He is a comcast customer. And some third party wifi access point blocked his smtp submission over TLS by setting up an asa device to inspect 587 as well. On Nov 28, 2014 6:16 AM, "William Herrin" <b...@herrin.us> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 2:54 PM, joel jaeggli <joe...@bogus.com> wrote: > > I don't see this in my home market, but I do see it in someone else's... > > I kind of expect this for port 25 but... > > > > J@mb-aye:~$telnet 147.28.0.81 587 > > Trying 147.28.0.81... > > Connected to nagasaki.bogus.com. > > Escape character is '^]'. > > 220 nagasaki.bogus.com ESMTP Sendmail 8.14.9/8.14.9; Thu, 27 Nov 2014 > > 19:17:44 GMT > > ehlo bogus.com > > 250-nagasaki.bogus.com Hello XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX.wa.comcast.net > > [XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX], pleased to meet you > > 250 ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES > > > > J@mb-aye:~$telnet 2001:418:1::81 587 > > Trying 2001:418:1::81... > > Connected to nagasaki.bogus.com. > > Escape character is '^]'. > > 220 nagasaki.bogus.com ESMTP Sendmail 8.14.9/8.14.9; Thu, 27 Nov 2014 > > 19:18:33 GMT > > ehlo bogus.com > > 250-nagasaki.bogus.com Hello > > [IPv6:2601:7:2380:XXXX:XXXX:XXXX:c1ae:7d73], pleased to meet you > > 250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES > > 250-PIPELINING > > 250-8BITMIME > > 250-SIZE > > 250-DSN > > 250-AUTH DIGEST-MD5 CRAM-MD5 LOGIN > > 250-STARTTLS > > 250-DELIVERBY > > 250 HELP > > > > that's essentially a downgrade attack on my ability to use encryption > > which seems to be in pretty poor taste frankly. > > > Hi Joel, > > I'm not sure I follow your complaint here. Are you saying that Comcast or a > Comcast customer in Washington state stripped the STARTTLS verb from the > IPv4 port 587 SMTP submission connection between you and a third party? > > Thanks, > Bill Herrin > > > -- > William Herrin ................ her...@dirtside.com b...@herrin.us > Owner, Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/> > May I solve your unusual networking challenges? >
