On 22-10-2014 17:30, Jeffrey Ollie wrote: > Hardly. The discussion so far has been weighted very heavily on the > side of Dana Carvey's "Grumpy Old Man"-style whining. "That's the way > it was and we liked it!". The people that like systemd (like myself) > have wisely learned that the people that hate systemd, hate it mostly > because it's different from what came before and don't want to change. > There's no way to argue rationally with that.
Not everyone "hates it". I for one would be very much interested in listening to what you have to say about systemd, if you find it to be a positive change. How is it better, and how you look at some of the concerns raised in this thread. At least for me, a balancing opinion would be welcome.