----- On Oct 12, 2014, at 8:53 AM, Sander Steffann san...@steffann.nl wrote:
> Hi, > >> Op 11 okt. 2014, om 23:00 heeft Roland Dobbins <rdobb...@arbor.net> het >> volgende >> geschreven: >> >>> On Oct 11, 2014, at 2:09 PM, Tim Raphael <raphael.timo...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> From my research, various authorities have recommended that a single /64 be >>>> allocated to router loopbacks with /128s assigned on interfaces. >>> >>> Yes, this is what I advocate for loopbacks. > > I often use the first /64 for loopbacks. Loopbacks are often used for > management, iBGP etc and having short and easy to read addresses can be > helpful. Something like 2001:db8::1 is easier to remember and type correctly > than e.g. 2001:db8:18ba:ff42::1 :) > > Cheers, > Sander I concur. I think think some have gotten confused with the suggesting of allocating a /64 for *ALL* loopbacks versus allocating a full /64 per loopback. Loopbacks should be /128, but all loopbacks for a site should be within a single /64 (the first one for reasons others, including Sander have said. -Randy
