On 10/3/14, 8:04 PM, Hugo Slabbert wrote: > I'm not clear on whether it runs afoul of FCC regs as it's not RF > interference directly but rather an (ab)use of higher layer control > mechanisms operating on that spectrum, but it probably does run afoul of > most "thou shalt not harm other networks" legislation like the > California example.
You can't get to layer 2 or layer 3 without layer 1. The abuse of higher layer control protocols requires an RF transmitter within the radio spectrum, hence it is interference. It is a much more selectively targeted type of interference than broadband noise, but it's very obviously interference over radio frequencies by any definition. -- -- Jay Hennigan - CCIE #7880 - Network Engineering - j...@impulse.net Impulse Internet Service - http://www.impulse.net/ Your local telephone and internet company - 805 884-6323 - WB6RDV
