>>>My reading of this is that these features are illegal, period. Rogue AP >>>detection is one thing, and disabling them via network or >>>"administrative" (ie. eject the guest) means would be fine, but >>>interfering with the wireless is not acceptable per the FCC regulations. >>> >>>Seems like common sense to me. If the FCC considers this 'interference', >>>which it apparently does, then devices MUST NOT intentionally interfere. >> >>I would expect interfering for defensive purposes **only** would be >>acceptable. > >What constitutes "defensive purposes"?
Since this is unlicensed spectrum, I don't think there is anything one has a right to defend :) /Mike
