On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 12:23 AM, Roland Dobbins <rdobb...@arbor.net> wrote: > > On Sep 16, 2014, at 10:33 PM, Andy Litzinger <andy.litzinger.li...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> I appreciate any ideas! > > My idea mainly centers around the operational complexity and difficulty of > troubleshooting a setup of this nature. >
yes, this. > Why not just let routing take its natural course? Or at most, play some > simple preference games which have consistent outcomes? > I think he's only getting default from his provider(s), which is a shame, get full routes instead and then play the preferences off...(I think). > This kind of thing is generally far more trouble than it's worth, in my > experience. > this, yes. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Roland Dobbins <rdobb...@arbor.net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com> > > Equo ne credite, Teucri. > > -- Laocoön >
