> On Sep 11, 2014, at 9:24 AM, Randy Bush <ra...@psg.com> wrote: > >>> According to https://stat.ripe.net/2000%3A%3A%2F6#tabId=routing >>> "2000::/6 is visible by 79% of 92 IPv6 RIS full peers." >> This problem has been solved. > > do we mark it up to pixie dust, or do we get an actual post mortem?
I talked to folks at 3549, they had a few tickets on it that took care of that. I know we are reviewing our “alloc-boundary” filter to prevent such a large prefix passing again. - Jared
