On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Murat Yuksel <yuk...@cse.unr.edu> wrote: > As far as I understand, NDN's basic premise is to > install "names" into the network layer.
Hi Murat, If they think names belong at layer 4 instead of layer 7 I can offer a couple insights on how this might be used to make layer 3 cheaper and more effective. If they think names belong at layer 3 everyone in this forum can rattle off a dozen reasons why that's totally wacko. On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Field, Brian <brian_fi...@cable.comcast.com> wrote: > I'm only going to touch on a small part of what I > understand NDN to be‹ namely making caching a first class citizen of the > network. Anycast can allow a supporting client to find the nearest device of type X. And it can allow the local device of type X to find the nearest regional device of type X. Making caching a first class network element is positively needless. Regards, Bill Herrin -- William Herrin ................ her...@dirtside.com b...@herrin.us Owner, Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/> Can I solve your unusual networking challenges?
