Agreed on DHCP, just passing along something i had heard about..... With that said, why wouldn't the TW guys just post something oh right they did, blame the other guy "Level3"
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 9:42 AM, Warren Bailey < wbai...@satelliteintelligencegroup.com> wrote: > Sounds more likely than "we broke the dhcp server". > > > Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device > > > > -------- Original message -------- > From: Chris Garrett <ch...@aperturefiber.com> > Date: 08/28/2014 6:39 AM (GMT-08:00) > To: "Naslund, Steve" <snasl...@medline.com> > Cc: nanog@nanog.org > Subject: Re: Time Warner outage? > > > I have never seen BGP drop peers because of a DHCP failure. > > I would love to see the breakdown on that. > > TW NOC had said it was a Level 3 fiber maintenance gone bad that took down > their peering connections when we called in at the time of the event. > > Can anyone confirm one way or the other? > > > On Aug 28, 2014, at 8:29 AM, Naslund, Steve <snasl...@medline.com> wrote: > > > Something sounds really unlikely about that. Lack of DHCP would not > cause reachability problems except for the clients. The trace below looks > like a transit connection that should be unaffected by DHCP. Looks more > like a routing issue. Also sounds unlikely that one DHCP server would be > covering this large a scope. > > > > Steven Naslund > > Chicago IL > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Chris Lane > > Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 8:23 AM > > To: Stephen Satchell > > Cc: nanog@nanog.org > > Subject: Re: Time Warner outage? > > > > I heard the following, > > > > It was actually an engineer doing maintenance on the dhpc server that > stopped customers from getting an IP address when the connected to the > network between 5:30 and 7:00. The funny part is upper Managment heard > about it on the today show > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 8:46 AM, Stephen Satchell <l...@satchell.net> > wrote: > > > >> This just keeps getting better and better: > >> > >> "Yahoo Logo > >> Will be right back... > >> > >> Thank you for your patience. > >> > >> Our engineers are working quickly to resolve the issue." > >> > >> My upstream is Charter Business... > >> > >> On 08/28/2014 04:05 AM, Chris Garrett wrote: > >>> I believe this is what is commonly referred to in our industry as a > >> “resume generating event”. > >>> > >>> > >>> On Aug 27, 2014, at 8:24 AM, Alexandru Suciu > >>> <alex.suciu....@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Can't wait to see the postmortem report on this one. > >>>> > >>>> On 8/27/2014 3:05 PM, Adam Greene wrote: > >>>>> Came back for us, too, at about 7am. > >>>>> > >>>>> Outage was a biggie this time: > >>>>> > >>>>> > >> https://news.yahoo.com/time-warner-cable-suffering-massive-nationwide- > >> outage > >>>>> -110549606.html > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>>> From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of David > >> Coulson > >>>>> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 6:59 AM > >>>>> To: Rick Coloccia > >>>>> Cc: <nanog@nanog.org> > >>>>> Subject: Re: Time Warner outage? > >>>>> > >>>>> Just came back up for me. > >>>>> > >>>>> Sent from my iPad > >>>>> > >>>>>> On Aug 27, 2014, at 6:48 AM, Rick Coloccia <coloc...@geneseo.edu> > >> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> BGPMON shows my routes falling off the net at around 5:49am. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> We now sit at their mercy.... > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -- > >>>>>> Sent from my iPhone > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Aug 27, 2014, at 6:46 AM, "Adam Greene" > >>>>>>> <maill...@webjogger.net> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> Same here. Seems like no traffic is exiting TWC: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Tracing route to ns03.savvis.net [204.70.25.234] over a maximum > >>>>>>> of > >> 30 > >>>>>>> hops: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> 1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 10049.webjogger.net [204.8.80.49] > >>>>>>> 2 27 ms 6 ms 5 ms cpe-24-29-112-25.nyc.res.rr.com > >>>>>>> [24.29.112.25] > >>>>>>> 3 12 ms 8 ms 7 ms rdc-69-193-225-74.nyc.bc.twcable.com > >>>>>>> [69.193.225.74] > >>>>>>> 4 9 ms 9 ms 12 ms > rdc-69-193-225-137.nyc.bc.twcable.com > >>>>>>> [69.193.225.137] > >>>>>>> 5 9 ms 10 ms 8 ms > rdc-69-193-225-222.nyc.bc.twcable.com > >>>>>>> [69.193.225.222] > >>>>>>> 6 * * * Request timed out. > >>>>>>> 7 * * * Request timed out. > >>>>>>> 8 * * * Request timed out. > >>>>>>> 9 * * * Request timed out. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>>>>> From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Rick > >>>>>>> Coloccia > >>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 6:43 AM > >>>>>>> To: nanog@nanog.org > >>>>>>> Subject: Re: Time Warner outage? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> My whole campus (~10000 users) is down... Since roughly 6am. > >>>>>>> TWC is our upstream. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Aug 27, 2014, at 6:28 AM, Rob Barbeau > >>>>>>>> <rob.barb...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> David, > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> I have a branch office in Syracuse,NY that appears to be down > >>>>>>>> at the moment that uses a time warner business connection for > >>>>>>>> internet > >> access. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> -rob > >>>>>>>> On Aug 27, 2014 5:20 AM, "David Hubbard" > >>>>>>>> <dhubb...@dino.hostasaurus.com> > >>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Hey all, anyone else having issues with Time Warner > >>>>>>>>> residential or business connections? One of our offices is > >>>>>>>>> down and the route is not currently in bgp. > >>>>>>>>> http://downdetector.com/status/time-warner-cable > >>>>>>>>> shows thousands of reports of outages on the consumer side > >>>>>>>>> starting an hour or so ago so I figure it's a larger issue > >>>>>>>>> than just my one office; couldn't reach anyone by phone. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> David > >>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > > //CL > > -- //CL
