In message <53ee8a4b.9000...@jima.us>, Jima writes: > On 2014-08-15 16:11, Mark Andrews wrote: > > For a public DNS64 service you also need a public NAT64. > > Not necessarily. If the public DNS64 server is using the well-known > prefix 64:ff9b::/96 (from RFC6052), then all an eyeball network needs to > do is route that /96 toward their own NAT64 environment. > > Jima
I can see a transfer request being made to TEXAS-WESLEYAN-UNIVERSITY for 64.64.64.0/24. Mark -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org
