On Aug 1, 2014, at 3:32 PM, Scott Helms <[email protected]> wrote: > Even in those cases where there isn't a layer 3 operator nor a chance for a > viable resale of layer 1/2 services.
I have a very hard time believing that if a city (no matter what size) had a
FTTH deployment, sold on a non-discriminatory basis to any providers, that
there would ever be zero layer 3 operators. Maybe it’s a corner case that will
occur in one small town somewhere that the long haul is crazy expensive to
reach, but it’s not a general problem that policy needs to optimize to handle.
--
Leo Bicknell - [email protected] - CCIE 3440
PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
