On 7/23/14 5:30 AM, Scott Helms wrote:
The people involved in the bond arrangements almost invariably see having the city the layer 3 provider as more reliable path to getting repaid than an open system.
I assumed this was true, that bonds with the revenue stream based upon rights-of-way lease only, or row+dark-fiber, or ... were each incrementally easier to sell, having incrementally larger per-customer revenue shares.
If anyone has specific bonds, or bonding experiences they can point to I'd appreciate the pointers.
TiA, Eric
