Isn't it interesting how that coincides with pay per bit (for the most part) pricing.
Scott Helms Vice President of Technology ZCorum (678) 507-5000 -------------------------------- http://twitter.com/kscotthelms -------------------------------- On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Ca By <cb.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Jul 22, 2014 7:04 AM, "Jared Mauch" <ja...@puck.nether.net> wrote: > > > > Verizon wireless has other transits apart from 701. > > > > That's interesting that they have a different capacity management strategy > for the competitive wireless market than they have for their captive > landline customers. > > Seems market forces are making wireless a functional network without the > peering brinksmanship while market failings are allowing landline to take > advantage of a captive install base > > > Sent via telepathy > > > > > On Jul 22, 2014, at 9:01 AM, Ca By <cb.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > Question: does verizon wireless have a different capacity / peering > > > practice from verizon broadband ? Or do verizon wireless customers > also > > > suffer the same performance issue? >
