On Monday, July 07, 2014 08:46:05 PM Jason Lixfeld wrote: > 1. You already know that multihop is very ugly. If it's > for a one-off, it's probably fine. But building a > product around multi-hop wouldn't be my first choice.
We prefer Layer 2 bundling technologies like 802.1AX, POS bundles or ML-PPP. However, some customers just can't support this, but have multiple links to us and need load sharing. In this case, eBGP Mulit-Hop is a reasonable use-case. Mark.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
