On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 8:49 AM, Lee Howard <l...@asgard.org> wrote: > > > On 5/22/14 8:04 AM, "Livingood, Jason" <jason_living...@cable.comcast.com> > wrote: > > >On 5/21/14, 9:38 PM, "Jared Mauch" <ja...@puck.nether.net> wrote: > > > >>On May 21, 2014, at 7:17 PM, Ca By <cb.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >>> Verizon Wireless is at 50% ipv6 penetration > >> > >>I suspect this would go up significantly if Twitter and Instagram would > >>IPv6 enable their services. Same for pintarest. > > > >+1 > >We naturally focus a lot on network enablement here, but IMO it is a great > >time to focus on more web-based services embracing IPv6 with another June > >6 just around the corner. :-) > > A side project I've been meaning to take on: > > In his really useful listing of content providers' IPv6 support, > https://www.vyncke.org/ipv6status/ Eric Vyncke has added "CDN" to sites > using an identifiable CDN. >
I suspect there's a problem with the data collection on that site; looking at https://www.vyncke.org/ipv6status/detailed.php?country=us I really don't think the top 5 players don't support IPv6 DNS queries at all. I'd be curious to know more about how the data there is collected; I don't see any links to any description of the data collection methodology on the site. Matt
