There is currently a doc for the ASR9k. We're working on getting on for 6500 as well.
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/routers/asr-9000-series-aggregation-services-routers/116999-problem-line-card-00.html On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 1:34 PM, <bedard.p...@gmail.com> wrote: > I would like to see Cisco send something out... > > -----Original Message----- > From: "Drew Weaver" <drew.wea...@thenap.com> > Sent: 5/6/2014 11:42 AM > To: "'nanog@nanog.org'" <nanog@nanog.org> > Subject: Getting pretty close to default IPv4 route maximum for > 6500/7600routers. > > Hi all, > > I am wondering if maybe we should make some kind of concerted effort to > remind folks about the IPv4 routing table inching closer and closer to the > 512K route mark. > > We are at about 94/95% right now of 512K. > > For most of us, the 512K route mark is arbitrary but for a lot of folks > who may still be running 6500/7600 or other routers which are by default > configured to crash and burn after 512K routes; it may be a valuable public > service. > > Even if you don't have this scenario in your network today; chances are > you connect to someone who connects to someone who connects to someone > (etc...) that does. > > In case anyone wants to check on a 6500, you can run: show platform > hardware capacity pfc and then look under L3 Forwarding Resources. > > Just something to think about before it becomes a story the community > talks about for the next decade. > > -Drew > >
