On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 9:26 AM, Mark Tinka <mark.ti...@seacom.mu> wrote:
> On Thursday, April 10, 2014 12:30:51 PM Randy Bush wrote: > > > as folk start to roll out rejection of invalids, we might > > think about how we report problems with folk registering > > inadequate roas, covering their customers, covering > > their deaggs (maybe deaggs get what they deserve), etc. > > if they are not clued enough to generate prudent roas, > > they will not be clued enough to generate ghostbusters > > (and neither ripe's nor apnic's software supports gbrs > > today). > > <snip> > It would be useful to use BGPmon's free RPKI validation > feature, which e-mails you, incessantly, about validation > failures due to un-ROA'd de-aggregates. > This seems like good idea and would also be good to know how else to know "I've broken something.". There's a BGP Visibility Project http://visibility.it.uc3m.es/ which perhaps could be brought to bear. Other thoughts out there? Tony
