On 4/9/2014 6:11 PM, bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com wrote: > On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 05:49:27PM -0400, Jeff Kell wrote: >> The most "sane" out-of-mind response should only be sent *if* the >> out-of-mind person is named explicitly as a recipient in the RFC822 >> header. Anything To: somelist@somehost does not qualify :) >> >> Jeff > and just how is an algorithm supposed to detect that > <jeff-k...@utc.edu> is a single human and not a list?
Because *I* set the out-of-office notification for my email address[es]. If I'm not in the recipient list, do not respond. This is a "per user" knob we are talking about here, so it knows darn well what address[es] are me. Jeff
