> Don't forget "Vanquish was a complete failure, so why would this be
> any different?" and "do I want Phil Raymond to sue me for violating
> the patent on this exact scheme?"
That was a specific reply by me to a specific suggestion of a
mechanism refunding e-postage to the sender if one wanted an e-mail or
leaving the charge if not.
As I said I think it's overly complex in implementation and not of
much benefit.
I don't see where Vanquish does any of this from the product site tho
I could look at the patents, they might cover more than they used in
products of course.
Really, this is a WKBI from 1997. Look at the patent if you don't believe
me.
Regards,
John Levine, jo...@iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. http://jl.ly
