Yes and no… Everyone who receives a direct allocation is a member. Those who receive direct assignments from ARIN, OTOH, are not members unless they choose to also pay an additional $500/year for that membership.
Owen On Mar 23, 2014, at 9:53 PM, Timothy Morizot <tmori...@gmail.com> wrote: > Unless I misremember, everyone who receives a direct allocation from ARIN > and signs an RSA is automatically a member. It's not clear to me what > "owner of a /24 network" means in that context. (I don't recall if signing > an LRSA in and of itself also makes one a member, since by the time we had > signed an LRSA, we had long since received our direct IPv6 allocation under > an RSA.) > > But perhaps Randy is looking for the number of /24 equivalents allocated to > legacy resource holders who haven't also received an IPv6 direct allocation > or other IPv4 direct allocation under an RSA? > > Scott > > > On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 10:46 PM, Naslund, Steve <snasl...@medline.com>wrote: > >> Exactly right John. I think the term "owned" is a problem here. >> >> It seems to me that the terms would correctly be "holder" or who the >> address space was issued to or "user" being the end user using that space. >> >> Wouldn't all of the holders be ARIN members unless grandfathered in? >> >> Steven Naslund >> Chicago IL >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: John Curran [mailto:jcur...@arin.net] >> Sent: Sunday, March 23, 2014 10:36 PM >> To: Randy Bush >> Cc: North American Network Operators' Group >> Subject: Re: arin representation >> >> On Mar 23, 2014, at 6:53 PM, Randy Bush <ra...@psg.com> wrote: >> >>> two questions: >>> >>> o of the /24s in the arin region, what percentage are owned by arin >>> members? >> >> Randy - >> >> Happy to generate these - two questions for clarity. >> >> 1) Should we expand /16's and /8's into the corresponding number of /24's ? >> (or do you only want those blocks issued originally as /24's to be >> counted) >> >> 2) In terms of categories, we could go strictly with /24's held by ARIN >> members >> versus /24's held by non-members (and resulting percentages); note >> that would >> be predominantly ISPs since end-users assignments from ARIN are >> unlikely to be >> members unless they specifically opted to join. Alternatively, we >> could provide >> counts /24's under RSA, /24's under LRSA, and /24's >> legacy-no-agreement as the >> three categories of counts desired (and each percentage of the total) >> >> So, based on above, would you prefer the /24 space statistics as asked >> (member/non-member) or rsa/lrsa/legacy-no-agreement? >> >>> o of the address holders in the arin region, what percentage are arin >>> members? >> >> Will do. >> >> Thanks! >> /John >> >> John Curran >> President and CEO >> ARIN >> >> >> >> >>
