On Mar 23, 2014, at 11:09 AM, Mark Tinka <mark.ti...@seacom.mu> wrote:
> On Sunday, March 23, 2014 06:57:26 PM Mark Andrews wrote: > >> ISP's have done a good job of brain washing their >> customers into thinking that they shouldn't be able to >> run services from home. That all their machines >> shouldn't have a globally unique address that is >> theoritically reachable from everywhere. That NAT is >> normal and desiriable. >> >> I was at work last week and because I have IPv6 at both >> ends I could just log into the machines at home as >> easily as if I was there. When I'm stuck using a IPv4 >> only service on the road I have to jump through lots of >> hoops to reach the internal machines. > > I expect this to change little in the enterprise space. I > think use of ULA and NAT66 will be one of the things > enterprises will push for, because how can a printer have a > public IPv6 address that is reachable directly from the > Internet, despite the fact that there is a properly > configured firewall at the perimetre offering half-decent > protection? > > Mark. So ULA the printers (if you must). That doesn’t create a need for ULA on anything that talks to the internet, nor does it create a requirement to do NPT or NAT66. Owen
