-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 3/23/2014 3:56 PM, Timothy Morizot wrote:
> My comments represent reality. Your security posture is much worse > in an IPv4 only configuration than if you enable and control IPv6. Says you. On the other hand, there are beaucoup enterprise networks unwilling to consider to moving to v6 until there are management, control, administrative, and security issues addressed. You can continue to deride our issues, and make derisive comments until your heart's content, but it does not change reality. And on that, it will be the last I say on the matter on NANOG. Best & Cheers, - - ferg - -- Paul Ferguson VP Threat Intelligence, IID PGP Public Key ID: 0x54DC85B2 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iF4EAREIAAYFAlMvbI4ACgkQKJasdVTchbK0igD+JF+M3DRoRz5wIJFo+tLV5dFF KuoOPKOQYJ8Vpf32aMsA/2ccs9CDrbq5hatw+LkL8/CHafTbOWGkhdYfjv7Q6ghM =HeCa -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
