On 28/02/2014 15:42, Jérôme Nicolle wrote: > Instead, IXPs _could_ enforce BCP38 too. Mapping the route-server's > received routes to ingress _and_ egress ACLs on IXP ports would mitigate > the role of BCP38 offenders within member ports. It's almost like uRPF > in an intelligent and useable form.
this will break horribly as soon as you have an IXP member which provides transit to other multihomed networks. Nick
