On 2/18/2014 8:42 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
They are smart and dkim sign their messages; even though it's invalid I
believe that's why it has such a low bayes score.
lots of the spam getting through has no dkim
It's getting marked as ham and not spam. Are you positive your
definitions are still updating?
sa-update has run. and it runs cleanly
randy
From a posting on NANAE:
On 2/18/2014 6:09 PM, Larry Sheldon wrote:
Received: from [207.254.213.223] (helo=drone166.ral.icpbounce.com)
Larry, icpbounce.com is IContact aka Vocus. I don't know whether the
managers of Vocus are as whitehat as those of IContact were before the
buyout, but Andrew Barrett was still in charge of abuse/deliverability
when I last checked and he *does* respond quickly and effectively to
spam complaints. Try sending this to ab...@icontact.com.
--
Requiescas in pace o email Two identifying characteristics
of System Administrators:
Ex turpi causa non oritur actio Infallibility, and the ability to
learn from their mistakes.
(Adapted from Stephen Pinker)
