Cool, thanks for the pointed. Now if we could get the data by ASN and publish it on a site like bcp38.info, that would be awesome.
On 2/4/14, 11:03 PM, "Frank Bulk" <frnk...@iname.com> wrote: >Here's such a report: > >http://spoofer.cmand.org/summary.php > >Frank > >-----Original Message----- >From: Livingood, Jason [mailto:jason_living...@cable.comcast.com] >Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2014 6:53 PM >To: Octavio Alvarez; North American Network Operators' Group >Subject: Re: BCP38 [Was: Re: TWC (AS11351) blocking all NTP?] > >On 2/4/14, 7:48 PM, "Octavio Alvarez" <alvar...@alvarezp.ods.org> wrote: > >>What I'm failing to understand, and again, please excuse me if I'm >>oversimplifying, is what data do you need from researchers, >>specifically. What specific actionable data would be helpful? Why does >>the lack of the data prevent you from applying an ACL. > >What I am suggesting is that the community at large needs measurement >data, rather than individual network operators (which already know if they >do or do not implement BCP38). Only with a long list of operators that DO >prevent spoofing and a list of those that DO NOT, backed up with a decent >data set (enough measurement points, enough measurement tests, across >enough time, with an openly shared methodology), can the community start >to encourage non-adopters to change their position. Just my two cents >though... > >Jason > > > >
