On Jan 29, 2014, at 10:22 PM, Christopher Morrow <morrowc.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
> maybe these weren't meant to be used outside the local ASN? :) > I do wonder though what the purpose of this block is? If it's to be > used inside the local ASN (as seems to be indicated based upon minimum > allocation sizes) then why not use the IETF marked 100.64/10 space > instead? Global-uniqueness? ok, sure... Seems like the obvious use case is for 6to4 NAT gateways, which would mean that global reachability would be expected. -Phil
