On Mon, 30 Dec 2013 14:34:52 +0000, "Dobbins, Roland" said: > My assumption is that this allegation about Cisco and Juniper is the result > of non-specialists reading about lawful intercept for the first time, and > failing to do their homework.
That does raise an interesting question. What percentage of Cisco gear that supports a CALEA lawful intercept mode is installed in situations where CALEA doesn't apply, and thus there's a high likelyhood that said support is misconfigured and abusable without being noticed?
pgp8jGvrDqnsl.pgp
Description: PGP signature
