On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Jon Lewis <jle...@lewis.org> wrote: > On Wed, 18 Dec 2013 valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote: > > On Wed, 18 Dec 2013 15:12:28 -0800, "cb.list6" said: >> >> I am strongly considering having my upstreams to simply rate limit ipv4 >>> UDP. It is the simplest solution that is proactive. >>> >> >> What are the prospects for ipv6 UDP not suffering the same fate? >> > > Roughly 0%, but there's so little v6 traffic compared to v4, you probably > don't have to worry about v6 attack traffic yet...particularly if you're > not dual stack yet. :) > > I understand that your answer about nil IPv6 traffic may be appropriate for your network, but for many of us IPv6 is currently a non-trivial amount of traffic that is growing quickly. And, in some cases, IPv6 is the dominate amount of traffic. Here are some quick stats of a few select familiar names from http://www.worldipv6launch.org/measurements/
Google Fiber 70% Virginia Tech 61% Verizon Wireless 40% Comcast 20% AT&T Wireline 15% T-Mobile US 6% > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Jon Lewis, MCP :) | I route > | therefore you are > _________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________ >
