That didn¹t seem to work for google.. ;) On 12/6/13, 9:39 AM, "Brandon Galbraith" <brandon.galbra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>If your flows are a target, or your data is of an extremely sensitive >nature (diplomatic, etc), why aren't you moving those bits over >something more private than IP (point to point L2, MPLS)? This doesn't >work for the VoIP target mentioned, but foreign ministries should most >definitely not be trusting encryption alone. > >brandon > >On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Jared Mauch <ja...@puck.nether.net> >wrote: >> >> On Dec 6, 2013, at 12:38 PM, Eugen Leitl <eu...@leitl.org> wrote: >> >>> >>> http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2013/12/bgp-hijacking-belarus-iceland/ >>> >>> Someone¹s Been Siphoning Data Through a Huge Security Hole in the >>>Internet >>> ... >> >>> In 2008, two security researchers at the DefCon hacker conference >>> demonstrated a massive security vulnerability in the worldwide internet >>> traffic-routing system ‹ a vulnerability so severe that it could allow >>> intelligence agencies, corporate spies or criminals to intercept >>>massive >>> amounts of data, or even tamper with it on the fly. >> ... >> >> Yes, nothing new to see here, networks don't do BGP filtering well, no >>Film at 11? >> >> I've detected 11.6 million of these events since 2008 just looking at >>the >> route-views data. Most recently the past two days 701 has done a large >>MITM of >> traffic. >> >> In other news, you can go read the other thread on this that happened >>already. >> >> http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/2013-November/062257.html >> >> - Jared >> >> >
