On Dec 2, 2013, at 18:20 , Ricky Beam <jfb...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, 02 Dec 2013 20:27:36 -0500, Owen DeLong <o...@delong.com> wrote: >>> They could be do much worse... if you throw out SLAAC, your network(s) can >>> be smaller than /64. I don't want to give them any ideas, but Uverse could >>> use their monopoly on routers to make your lan a DHCP only /120. >> >> I think if they did that, they'd do more to evaporate Uverse customers than >> to change the world of IPv6 routing at this point. > > I'd like to see the results of such an experiment. I suspect 90% of their > users wouldn't even notice. (given how many don't even realize IPv6 is on, > until some site(s) run dog slow until they're told (how) to turn IPv6 off.) > > Not counting MAC users, because they cannot do DHCPv6 without 3rd party > software.
My Macs seem to do DHCPv6 just fine here without third party software, so I'm not sure what you are talking about. > > Nobody really cared with they limited what RFC1918 space you could use. (not > sure they're still doing that.) Not sure what you mean here since RFC-1918 is IPv4 only. Owen
