I meant that PTR isn't a priority for ISPs. A la Comcast's rollout of IPv6 lacks PTR, as does Google in general for v4 and v6 (even though they have it internally).
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Joe Abley <jab...@hopcount.ca> wrote: > > On 2013-10-22, at 15:16, Blair Trosper <blair.tros...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Everyone loves IPv6, and it's a fantastic technology. However, I've been > > pondering a few quirks of v6, including the low priority of PTR, > > Not sure what that means, but... > > > but I have a question I want to throw out there: > > > > Do you think IPv6 geolocatoin (GeoIP) will ever be viable? > > To me it seems like an easier problem to solve than IPv4. There's no > historical assignment swamp. Subnets are of fixed size. Many/most > organisations who receive a direct assignment will never need a second. > > > If so, when do you think this will happen? > > As soon as enough people using geo-located services start doing so over v6. > > > Joe > >
