On Sep 29, 2013, at 12:49 AM, Blake Dunlap <iki...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes, I was lazy in most of the adaptation, but I think it serves a > good starting point for market based suggestions to the route slot > problem. > > Your post advocates a > > (X) technical ( ) legislative (X) market-based ( ) vigilante > > approach to fighting spam^H^H^H^H route deaggregation. Your idea will > not work. Here is why it won't work. > ...
There's actually no new technology involved, and you're overlooking the fact that there already _is_ market operating when it comes to routing table slots - try asking your ISP if they'll accept and propagate more specifics and your answer is going based on imputed worth to them as a customer... you just have no visibility into their assessment of your value, nor any way to make the judgement yourself and pay accordingly. FYI, /John
