On 9/24/13 8:10 PM, Nathanael C. Cariaga wrote: > Hi, > > I raised actually this concern during our IP resource application. > > On a personal note, I think /48 IPv6 allocation is more than enough for > our organization to use for at least the next 5-10 years assuming that > this can be farmed out to our multiple sites. What makes this > complicated for us is that we are operating on a multiple sites > (geographically) with each site is doing multi-homing and having a /48 > in each site would be very big waste of IP resources.
It's not waste and you should adjust the expectations somewhat. With a /48 You typically have enough bits to do hierachical addressing plans, prefix delegation and other things which you may need but are not currently planning for. > -nathan > > On 9/25/2013 2:36 AM, Bryan Socha wrote: >> Everyone is following the same policies. a /48 PER SITE. did you >> request enough addresses from your RIR? >> >> Bryan Socha >> > >
