On 24/09/2013, at 12:02 AM, Job Snijders <job.snijd...@atrato.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 11:28:58PM +1000, Geoff Huston wrote: > >> On 23/09/2013, at 8:01 PM, Nick Hilliard <n...@foobar.org> wrote: >> >>> I look forward to the day when we have proper 32 bit BGP community >>> support and ASN32s finally become usable on nontrivial networks. >>> >> >> Is there some reference that describes the problems with the use of >> RFC5668? I was not aware that there were residual issues here. > > It would've been really nice if one could fit more than 16 bit in the > locally administrated part. > > Kind regards, > > Job I'm sorry, but I'm still confused, as I see your comment as one that relates to the size of the payload field here, as distinct from the support for 32 bit AS numbers per se. Geoff
