On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Bradley Huffaker <bhuff...@caida.org>wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 02:45:09PM -0700, Matthew Petach wrote: > > Hitting 93% accuracy is actually pretty mindblowing > > from my perspective, given how random some of > > the naming choices are. ^_^; > > This is the number of times we think we have an answer and it is wrong. > Ah, so that would include cases like thinking CH1 and CHE might be nearby, rather than halfway around the planet, but wouldn't include things like MUD, where there wouldn't even be a guess at an answer. > It does not include the number of times we failed to find an answer that > is there. Although we have plans to search for nonstandard names in the > future, we currently do not look for them and so can't get them wrong. > Thanks for the clarification around the number--makes much more sense now. :) Matt
