In message <9ff40d24-169e-4568-9f25-ee00beeed...@matthew.at>, Matthew Kaufman writes: > Well, for starters there's whole truckloads of surplus gear that you > can't get for pennies and use successfully.
Surplus IPv6 capable gear has been around for a long while now. Remember most gear has had IPv6 for over a decade now. A lot of gear that ISC got given for IPv6 development was on it 2nd or 3rd repurposing before we got it nearly a decade ago. > Matthew Kaufman > > (Sent from my iPhone) > > On Jul 4, 2013, at 11:11 AM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote: > > > On Thu, 04 Jul 2013 10:34:41 -0700, Eric Brunner-Williams said: > > > >> #insert usual junk from *nog v6 evangelicals that .africa and .eos > >> (Basque Autonomous Region) must drive v6 adoption from their > >> ever-so-deep-pockets, or the net will die. > > > > I'll bite. What's the *actual* additional cost for dnssec and ipv6 > > support for a greenfield rollout? It's greenfield, so there's no > > "our older gear/software/admins need upgrading" issues. > -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org
