On 6/23/13 10:57 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Christopher Morrow
<morrowc.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 9:47 AM, William Allen Simpson
<william.allen.simp...@gmail.com> wrote:
On 6/23/13 12:48 AM, Scott Weeks wrote:
http://www.gdc4s.com/Documents/Products/SecureVoiceData/NetworkEncryption/GD-FASTLANE-w.pdf
That's rather a surprising choice (ATM product) for an IP network.
Please describe what backbone you are running that uses a FASTLANE?
I'd be surprised if a civilian org could buy a fastlane device,..
maybe they moved out of the gov't only world though since the last
time I saw one? It does claim to do oc-48 rate sonet though.
http://www.gdc4s.com/kg-530.html
claims 40gbps... I don't know that a purely civilian org can purchase
these though, nor the kg-75, despite these being on the GD site.
And at $189,950 MSRP, obviously every ISP is dashing out the door
for a pair for each and every long haul fiber link. ;-)
Hard to see the IETF multi-vendor interoperability specifications. It
does mention SNMPv3, unlike all their other products which use a
proprietary management scheme. Also HTTP, although no mention of its
purpose.
At least the FASTLANE mentioned above specifies FIREFLY -- the mere
rumor of which was our basis for naming Photuris [RFC2522].
Hopefully, other folks are securing their PPP or ethernet packets?
But I don't see where you mention that Google is actually using
these to secure your fiber?
