> Bing supports IPv6: http://www.worldipv6launch.org/
Noted. > The site www.xbox.com supports IPv6 (ditto), but the Xbox device does not. Noted. > My favorite place to see what content supports IPv6 is Eric Vyncke's site: > http://www.vyncke.org/ipv6status/detailed.php?country=us An excellent resource. > Thus, Microsoft points off for live.com, msn.com, > microsoft.com, etc. > > Similarly, partial credit to Amazon for ELB on AWS [1], but points off for > amazon.com, ebay.com, and for pity's sake, aws.amazon.com and > amazonaws.com. > > > [1] > http://aws.amazon.com/about-aws/whats-new/2011/05/24/elb-ipv6-zoneapex-secu > ritygroups/ > > But to see the rest, you have come to NANOG58 in New Orleans! Thanks for providing those links, Lee. Definitely worth watching. >> Actually, if Amazon.com lit up IPv6, it would dramatically change the >> IPv6-only >> client landscape. I believe they are the single largest IPv4-only content >> provider >> remaining. IIRC from Lee's statistics, Amazon + any 2 other members of the >> Alexa 100 would make it possible for 70% or more of web traffic to go over >> IPv6. > > Not mine; Alain Fiocco's numbers at http://6lab.cisco.com/stats/ > It's not quite that positive, either, but you can see in the Information > page of that site that there's a very sharp bend in which sites get the > most hits. The top 15-20 are disproportionate; after that, in many cases > substitute web sites are available. Thanks… Thanks for the reference as well. >> I've been doing just that. Interestingly, I got a great deal of criticism >> for doing >> so recently. > > Where do you name and shame suits? Hint: it isn't NANOG. In the case to which I refer, it was Facebook. > Lee, who has been known to wear a suit And who I occasionally attempt to shame for the slow pace of IPv6 deployment at TW Cable. ;-) Owen
