On 4/1/2013 10:15 PM, Eric Adler wrote: > Make sure you don't miss the QoS implementation of RFC 2549 (and make sure > that you're ready to implement RFC 6214). You'll be highly satisfied with > the results (presuming you and your packets end up in one of the higher > quality classes). > I'd also suggest a RFC 2322 compliant DHCP server for devices inside the > hurricane zone, but modified by implementing zip ties such that the C47s > aren't released under heavy (wind or water) loads.
Actually, given recent events, I'd emphasize and advocate RFC3514 (http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3514.txt) which I think is LONG overdue for adoption. The implementation would forego most of the currently debated topics as related to network abuse or misuse :) Jeff
