> Yeah, I thought so, too, but apparently the FCC and the SEC hasn't > seen it that way for the past 20 years. Go figure. :-) >
The FCC doesn't understand that 4Mbps customer-facing speed on the tail circuit alone does NOT define broadband in a meaningful way. The SEC does not understand that IPv4 risk and the lack of an IPv6 strategy should be a required risk consideration in a Sarbanes Oxley filing. I have little hope that these particular federal agencies will ever agree with me about such nuanced issues. Owen
