On Mar 28, 2013, at 7:20 PM, Adam Vitkovsky wrote: > It's a pity that rpf is not "on" by default for interfaces over which the > ebgp session is configured.
As has been noted here and on cisco-nsp several times, unfortunately, there are too many instances in which enabling uRPF automagically would break things and thus overwhelm vendor support desks for network vendors to do this. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Roland Dobbins <rdobb...@arbor.net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com> Luck is the residue of opportunity and design. -- John Milton
