Dobbins, Roland wrote:

> It is always amusing to see people allude to the end-to-end
> principle to support their arguments, when in fact the
> end-to-end principle is either inapplicable to the topic
> at hand, or actually lends support to the opposite of their
> arguments.

Abstract nonsense.

> There are cogent arguments to be made against LISP and
> LISP-like systems.  But none of those arguments have
> been raised in this thread, so far.

Never ignore the following problem:

   Assuming that there are 4G mobile devices in the world, the
   mapping table has more than 4G entries each updated every
   minute or second.

                                                Masataka Ohta



Reply via email to