Dobbins, Roland wrote: > It is always amusing to see people allude to the end-to-end > principle to support their arguments, when in fact the > end-to-end principle is either inapplicable to the topic > at hand, or actually lends support to the opposite of their > arguments.
Abstract nonsense. > There are cogent arguments to be made against LISP and > LISP-like systems. But none of those arguments have > been raised in this thread, so far. Never ignore the following problem: Assuming that there are 4G mobile devices in the world, the mapping table has more than 4G entries each updated every minute or second. Masataka Ohta