Dobbins, Roland wrote:
> It is always amusing to see people allude to the end-to-end
> principle to support their arguments, when in fact the
> end-to-end principle is either inapplicable to the topic
> at hand, or actually lends support to the opposite of their
> arguments.
Abstract nonsense.
> There are cogent arguments to be made against LISP and
> LISP-like systems. But none of those arguments have
> been raised in this thread, so far.
Never ignore the following problem:
Assuming that there are 4G mobile devices in the world, the
mapping table has more than 4G entries each updated every
minute or second.
Masataka Ohta
