On 7 Mar 2013, at 02:50, Dobbins, Roland wrote:
>
> On Mar 7, 2013, at 11:36 AM, Jared Mauch wrote:
>
>> I would pitch it as follows: We need to at least have IPv6 access to
>> troubleshoot/understand customers that have dual-stack technology.
>
> That's a great point, but my guess is that the suits will say that since none
> of their customers are using IPv6, there's no urgency (yes, I know, it's
> better to be prepared ahead of time; but foresight doesn't generally carry
> much weight in quarterly-driven enterprises).
>
Yes, but this is an argument to deploy the whole IPv6 thing, not
against a strategy to first deploy in-house and then to customers, isn't it?
In my experience, it is always best to try IPv6 in-house (at least a
small office, a group, etc.) and then move to customers, YMMV.
/as
