On 19 January 2013 04:48, Doug Barton <do...@dougbarton.us> wrote: > No, because NAT-like solutions to perpetuate v4 only handle the client side > of the transaction. At some point there will not be any more v4 address to > assign/allocate to content provider networks. They have seen the writing on > the wall, and many of the largest (both by traffic and market share) have > already moved to providing their content over v6.
Potentially another source of IPv4 addresses - every content network (/hosting provider/etc) that decides they don't want to give their customers IPv6 reachability is a future bankrupt ISP with a load of IPv4 to sell off :) - Mike
